-Subscribe to receive regular updates-
All Posts      Healthcare      Environmental      Finance      Intellectual Property      ERISA      Ebola Legal Resource      Young Lawyers
HHS Issues Proposed Rule for MACRA Quality Payment Program
HHS Issues Proposed Rule for MACRA Quality Payment Program
By Beth Pitman, Brandy Mann | 05-18-2016

Following up on the passage of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently issued a proposed rule to replace the Medicare sustainable growth rate (SGR) methodology which was repealed by MACRA. The proposed rule would  implement the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) to replace SGR and establish incentives for participation in Advanced Alternative Payment Models (Advanced APMs).

CMS intends to drive more physicians toward participation in APMs with the goal that, by the end of 2018, 50% of Medicare payments through APMs and 90% of fee-for-service payments will be tied to quality or value. MIPS applies only to certain physicians and other clinicians who provide services under Medicare Part B; however, in 2021 forward, those who participate in the Advanced APM models may report based on Medicare, Medicaid and commercial payor covered services.  Participants in Advanced APMs would receive 5% lump sum bonuses and a .75% fee increase annually as compared to MIPS eligible clinicians who may experience downward payment adjustments and a maximum of .5% annual increase.  

The rigorous qualifying criterion for Advanced APM treatment (only six of the current 25 APM models would qualify) will initially ensure that  the overwhelming majority of physicians will fall under MIPS, and CMS expects that the majority of those physicians will fall under the minimum threshold established by the proposed rule. MIPS would establish payment adjustments based on a composite score of aggregated “performance categories”: (1) quality, (2) resource use, (3) clinical practice improvement activities (“CPIAs”), and (4) advancing care information (CEHRT use).   

As a result of the rule’s budget neutrality, CMS anticipates that only a very small percentage of physicians will experience positive payment adjustments (of up to 22%) with the majority of clinicians at or below the threshold experiencing as much as  a negative 4% adjustment. The proposed rule offers some relief for small practices and rural health clinics, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and critical access hospitals (CAHs). While there are clear advantages for physicians/groups already participating in or considering participation in an APM structure, the structure must reflect the specific risk criteria set out by CMS. 

HHS and CMS have published a fact sheet on the proposed rule, and comments can be submitted until June 27, 2016 at this link.

Share this post

   
COMMENTS


Author Information

Elizabeth N. Pitman, CHPC
205.226.5704
beth.pitman@wallerlaw.com
website bio

Brandy Schnautz Mann
512.685.6458
brandy.mann@wallerlaw.com
website bio